I think I would use F=: +./@E."1 S:0 'ab' F 'abcd' 1 'ab' F ;:'abcd defg zabc' 1 0 1 'ab cd ef' F&;: 'abcd defg zabc' 1 0 0
-- Raul On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Kip Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > Verb f below is an example of "Subtle J". Is there a "Simple J" way? > > I first saw verb f in a note from Linda Alvord. > > f=: 13 :'x&(+./@E.)&>y' > > 'bc' f 'a bc def';'ab cde f';'abc d ef' > 1 0 1 > > As you see, f tells which strings on the right contain the left string. > > Experienced J users know that f operates by first forming the verb > x&(+./@E.)&> and then applying that verb to y . They also know "that > verb" will be applied to each box in y independently of the others and > the separate results assembled into the final answer. > > Is there a way to do it using mostly trains and rank? A "Simple J" way > for less experienced users? > > You hear the plea of an ex college teacher who dealt with less > experienced users! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
