Thanks Roger! I'd give it a shot, if we weren't taken up prying my daughter's kitten out of the Christmas tree.
Roger Hui wrote: > Reminds me of what Ken told me once: Let's you and him fight. No thanks! > :-) > > Merry Christmas everyone. > > > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, PMA<peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu> wrote: > >> Anybody want to take up the flag? >> Happy Holidays! >> PMA >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: OT programming languages/ systems for advanced applications >> on Linux >> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:50:59 -0500 >> From: PMA<peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu> >> To: debian-u...@lists.debian.org >> >> Rather than APL itself -- value judgement aside -- >> you might consider its successor and superset, >> *J* ( http://www.jsoftware.com/ ). >> >> >> Miles Fidelman wrote: >>> David Christensen wrote: >>>> >>>> Any other comments/ suggestions regarding programming languages/ >>>> systems for advanced applications on Linux? >>>> >>> Lisp >>> Smalltalk >>> Erlang >>> Haskell >>> Caml/OCaml >>> APL - if you're crazy or want to be; or you could go all the way to >>> Brainfuck (http://esolangs.org/wiki/Brainfuck) >>> for that matter, Ada, if you're writing mission-critical/safety-critical >>> systems >>> >>> If you're really interested in programming languages: >>> http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/ >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
