I can report in Christmas spirit, that "coax" worked better than "pry".

PMA wrote:
> Thanks Roger!  I'd give it a shot, if we weren't taken up
> prying my daughter's kitten out of the Christmas tree.
>
>
> Roger Hui wrote:
>> Reminds me of what Ken told me once: Let's you and him fight. No thanks!
>> :-)
>>
>> Merry Christmas everyone.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 9:02 AM, PMA<peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody want to take up the flag?
>>> Happy Holidays!
>>> PMA
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: OT programming languages/ systems for advanced applications
>>> on Linux
>>> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 11:50:59 -0500
>>> From: PMA<peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu>
>>> To: debian-u...@lists.debian.org
>>>
>>> Rather than APL itself -- value judgement aside --
>>> you might consider its successor and superset,
>>> *J* ( http://www.jsoftware.com/ ).
>>>
>>>
>>> Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>>> David Christensen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Any other comments/ suggestions regarding programming languages/
>>>>> systems for advanced applications on Linux?
>>>>>
>>>> Lisp
>>>> Smalltalk
>>>> Erlang
>>>> Haskell
>>>> Caml/OCaml
>>>> APL - if you're crazy or want to be; or you could go all the way to
>>>> Brainfuck (http://esolangs.org/wiki/Brainfuck)
>>>> for that matter, Ada, if you're writing
>>>> mission-critical/safety-critical
>>>> systems
>>>>
>>>> If you're really interested in programming languages:
>>>> http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to