You would write the C version 'return x>20' which is clearer than the J version 
in this case I would argue. 

___________________________

David Vaughan

On 25 Dec 2011, at 08:48, Björn Helgason <gos...@gmail.com> wrote:

> " I once had a friend tell me that "if (x>20) return true; else return
> false;" was clearer than the J equivalent ">&20". I hope you can see past "
> 
> Then this should be  ">&20  y"
> 
> 2011/12/25 Joey K Tuttle <j...@qued.com>
> 
>> Yes, but -
>> 
>>> &5   i. 10
>> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
>> 
>> - joey    iPh...
>> 
>> On Dec 24, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Björn Helgason <gos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>  21 >&20
>>> |syntax error
>>> |       21>&20
>>>  21 >20
>>> 1
>>> 
>>> 2011/12/24 Marshall Lochbaum <mwlochb...@gmail.com>
>>> 
>>>> false;" was clearer than the J equivalent ">&20". I hope you can see
>> past
>>>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to