You would write the C version 'return x>20' which is clearer than the J version in this case I would argue.
___________________________ David Vaughan On 25 Dec 2011, at 08:48, Björn Helgason <gos...@gmail.com> wrote: > " I once had a friend tell me that "if (x>20) return true; else return > false;" was clearer than the J equivalent ">&20". I hope you can see past " > > Then this should be ">&20 y" > > 2011/12/25 Joey K Tuttle <j...@qued.com> > >> Yes, but - >> >>> &5 i. 10 >> 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 >> >> - joey iPh... >> >> On Dec 24, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Björn Helgason <gos...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 21 >&20 >>> |syntax error >>> | 21>&20 >>> 21 >20 >>> 1 >>> >>> 2011/12/24 Marshall Lochbaum <mwlochb...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> false;" was clearer than the J equivalent ">&20". I hope you can see >> past >>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm