Hi,

I was reading https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2026-June/056346.html where Greg mentions "Also use command-line proj:  $ projinfo -s ETRF2000 -t ETRF2020 which returns a lot of operations that surprise me, being time-dependent transforms with non-zero rates".

Indeed PROJ does that transformation using a ITRF2020 pivot, which is in line with the EUREF technical note 1 (http://etrs89.ensg.ign.fr/pub/EUREF-TN-1-Mar-04-2024.pdf). But the consequence of using such time-dependent transforms is that the results depends *and change* on a coordinate epoch.  So ETRFxx frames are not "static" ? From a number of things seen in past years, it looks to me that this opposition of static vs dynamic frames is still very fuzzy and perhaps is not relevant at all. On the US side their recent renaming of NATRF2022 to NATRF2022e2020 (epoch 2020.0) also shows similar confusion.

$ echo 49 2 0 2000 | bin/cs2cs -d 8 ETRF2000 ETRF2020
49.00000061    1.99999942 0.00346292 2000
$ echo 49 2 0 2015 | bin/cs2cs -d 8 ETRF2000 ETRF2020
49.00000065    1.99999955 0.01117636 2015
$ echo 49 2 0 2020 | bin/cs2cs -d 8 ETRF2000 ETRF2020
49.00000067    1.99999960 0.01374751 2020

The good news is that while playing with the online  ETRF/ITRF Coordinate Transformation Tool (ECTT)  tool (https://epncb.oma.be/_productsservices/coord_trans/index.php#results), both this tool and PROJ agree at the tenth of millimeter on a few random points I tried, and when checking the " show intermediate steps" tick box, one can also see they use a ITRF2020 intermediate (actually they do ETRF2000 -> ITRF2000 -> ITRF2020 -> ETRF2020 at the specified epoch.  But the ETRF2000 -> ITRF2020 direct transformation we have in PROJ must be the compaction of ITRF2000 -> ITRF2000 -> ITRF2020)

/me still not having any clue at geodesy ;-)

Even

--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot

_______________________________________________
PROJ mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj

Reply via email to