> This week, I see 0.1 mm as totally acceptable rounding/etc. error.  1 mm is 
> probably actually ok but socially unacceptable and 1 cm is IMHO a real 
> problem.

For end-users, 1 cm measurement precision is the best they can get for points 
without a permanent GNSS station. To make sure the transformation accuracy is 
negligible, we require software to give correct results within 1 mm for the 
transformation to/from Dutch CRSs. To check this fairly with PROJ, 0.1 mm 
accuracy is indeed good enough.

For permanent GNSS stations a few mm is the best measurement precision we can 
get. So, for transforming GNSS station coordinates with PROJ, 0.1 mm accuracy 
is good enough too.

Jochem


Disclaimer:
De inhoud van deze e-mail is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor de 
geadresseerde(n).
Gebruik, openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging, verspreiding en/of verstrekking van 
deze informatie aan derden is niet toegestaan.
Op al onze producten en diensten zijn onze algemene leveringsvoorwaarden van 
toepassing
[https://www.kadaster.nl/algemene-leveringsvoorwaarden].

Disclaimer:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, 
copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this 
information is strictly prohibited.
Our general terms and conditions of delivery apply to all our products and 
services
[https://www.kadaster.com/general-terms-and-conditions].
_______________________________________________
PROJ mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj

Reply via email to