SIMON Nicolas via PROJ <[email protected]> writes: > Another aspect of the problem is the stability of the official definitions > already in place. > For the Belgian Lambert 2008 projection (EPSG:3812), the EPSG has defined a > new projection with epochs (EPSG:11219).
I think the key question here is whether the Belgian $(Geodetic_Authority) has changed the definition of an established name, and EPSG is following, or if something else is going on. In general, the situation projected CRSes with an underlying datum that is an ensemble, or worse turned into an ensemble, is messy. It's further messy if there is blurring of system and the ensemble of frames implementing that system. _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
