Even, Thank you for your checks. What I wanted to share is the example of the modifications made by EPSG that led to corruption of the transformation data. This raises questions about EPSG's validation process.
Nicolas -----Message d'origine----- De : Even Rouault <[email protected]> Envoyé : mercredi 22 juillet 2026 13:28 À : SIMON Nicolas <[email protected]>; [email protected] Objet : Re: [PROJ] EPSG release once more busted Nicolas, > were based on geocs 4258, and EPSG proposed a new mix of > transformations > BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (1) (EPSG:1652) based on geocs 11063 > BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (2) (EPSG:15928) based on geocs 11063 > BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2011] (3) (EPSG:8369) based on geocs 11215 I've just verified that the 12.059a update has reverted them back to using EPSG:4258 ETRS89. can also be checked at: - https://epsg.org/transformation_1652/BD72-to-ETRS89-1.html - https://epsg.org/transformation_15928/BD72-to-ETRS89-2.html - https://epsg.org/transformation_8369/BD72-to-ETRS89-3.html Even -- http://www.spatialys.com/ My software is free, but my time generally not. LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot. _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
