It's no wonder there are problems with EPSG if it's just as full of
idiots as the PROJ crew... All the best! :D
Janne
------------------------------------------------------
On 2026-07-22 18:06, SIMON Nicolas via PROJ wrote:
Even,
Thank you for your checks.
What I wanted to share is the example of the modifications made by EPSG
that led to corruption of the transformation data.
This raises questions about EPSG's validation process.
Nicolas
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Even Rouault <[email protected]>
Envoyé : mercredi 22 juillet 2026 13:28
À : SIMON Nicolas <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Objet : Re: [PROJ] EPSG release once more busted
Nicolas,
were based on geocs 4258, and EPSG proposed a new mix of
transformations
BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (1) (EPSG:1652) based on geocs 11063
BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2002] (2) (EPSG:15928) based on geocs 11063
BD72 to ETRS89-BEL [BEREF2011] (3) (EPSG:8369) based on geocs 11215
I've just verified that the 12.059a update has reverted them back to
using EPSG:4258 ETRS89.
can also be checked at:
- https://epsg.org/transformation_1652/BD72-to-ETRS89-1.html
- https://epsg.org/transformation_15928/BD72-to-ETRS89-2.html
- https://epsg.org/transformation_8369/BD72-to-ETRS89-3.html
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com/
My software is free, but my time generally not.
LLMs contribute to global warming and brain rot.
_______________________________________________
PROJ mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
_______________________________________________
PROJ mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
