Hello Samuele, [...] >> We have a few collections that do not belong to the «public tree» of >> collections, either because they are not ready for public consumption >> (yet), or because created them for internal uses. In our case, they >> are not strict secret, so we were not worried if anybody accidentally >> saw them. As I understand your workaround, those records will be >> restricted to, at least, registered users with a known role. I'm not >> yet sure if we would prefer the old scenario, but I'd like to know it >> just to discuss it internally. > > mmh... actually records belonging to (un-restricted in WebAccess) > “orphan” collections should be accessible by guest users. I know that > in the past there was a known bug that made displaying a “restricted” > label for those records (Jerome might have already fixed it), but this > was just a visualization issue: as soon as webcoll is associating a > give record to at least one collection, then the before-mentioned > security check is no longer enforced, and hence such records should > become accessible.
You are right, sorry! But me too (a little bit!). Those records are indeed publicly (guest) accessible, but with the red flag labeling them as «Restricted»; that's why I wrongly thought guest could not access them. Probably it is not a big deal but, again, we haven't talked internaly yet. Thanks, Ferran PS Still working the upload forms, I'll reply later on the other thread...
