On 15/01/06 at 13:07 +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
>
> URL:
> <http://gna.org/task/?func=detailitem&item_id=2779>
>
> Summary: switching homepage to SVN
> Project: Gna! Administration
> Submitted by: yeupou
> Submitted on: dimanche 15.01.2006 à 13:07
> Status: None
> Approval Status: None
> Should Start On: dimanche 15.01.2006 à 00:00
> Should be Finished on: dimanche 15.01.2006 à 00:00
> Category: Services Functionalities
> Priority: 5 - Normal
> Privacy: Public
> Assigned to: None
> Open/Closed: Open
>
> _______________________________________________________
>
> Details:
>
> I think we should switch to SVN for homepages. It is easy to use for SVN
> users and it would probably save us CPU time for the homepage updates.
>
> We should simply add a /homepage.gna.org directory into each SVN directory,
> and that one would be picked.
>
> Any opinion?
I don't really like it. You can't assume anything on the way people use
their subversion repositories. Some people might go for the classic :
.
|-- branches
|-- tags
| |-- tag1
| |-- tag2
| `-- tag3
`-- trunk
|-- subproj1
|-- subproj2
`-- subproj3
While others might not use "subprojects", or use :
.
|-- subproj1
| |-- branches
| |-- tags
| `-- trunk
|-- subproj2
| |-- branches
| |-- tags
| `-- trunk
`-- subproj3
|-- branches
|-- tags
`-- trunk
Also, some people might want to use tags on their website.
The best way to deal with that would be to just ask for a path inside
their SVN tree which contains the up-to-date version of their website.
Also, this would solve the problem of daily SVN tarballs mentionned by
Vincent Caron on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
_______________________________________________
Project mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gna.org:8080/listinfo/project
