http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/commentary/is-the-government-serious-about-reform-or-just-talking-about-it/524439
Is the Government Serious About Reform, or Just Talking About It?
Maggy Horhoruw | June 15, 2012

 'Reform, or to be more precise, continuous reform, should be the business 
principle of our government.' Having shunned Orde Baru in 1998, democracy and 
democratization have marked Indonesia’s history. 

The country has since been regarded as poster child by Western democracies to 
showcase a relatively successful transition from a repressive government to a 
democratic one, and how democracy can work in harmony with Islam.

Indonesia has also been considered as having a resilient, emerging economy that 
thrived after the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis and the later 2008 global 
slowdown. 

Being an Indonesian, I am proud to have my country respected in such a way and 
frequently mentioned in positive contexts. 
Finally, Indonesia is no longer simply associated with corruption.

In 2010, we started bureaucracy reform on top of other ongoing reforms, like 
electoral, judicial and financial. Bureaucracy reform is a tall order, 
something reflected in the disbelief people showed when I saw that the 
government was reforming itself. It appears to be a mind-staggering idea that a 
government of our size can actually undergo reform.

Where do we start? How are we going to do it? Who’s leading the process? Where 
are we going with the reform? Is there a role model to follow? What do we do if 
a minister is not compliant to the national reform agenda? Those are just a few 
of the questions that the government needs to answer — and keep in mind — while 
reforming itself.

Dictionaries define reform as: improve, refine, make better, reconstruct, 
revamp, reorganize and restructure, the very opposite of a status quo. Reform 
doesn’t mean staying the same or retaining the old ways. Even if they are good, 
old ways always have room for improvement. 

Our neighbors in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations are waking up and 
pushing ahead as emerging markets. If Indonesia wants to stay competitive, 
reform is the only way to go. Reform is not just a program that the government 
should set for the next 15 years. Reform, or to be precise, continuous reform 
should be the business principle of our government. Reform is how we got our 
recent recognition and it is the only way to remain above mediocrity.

Our justice system cannot remain vague. Our legal system should be cleansed of 
all contradicting and overlapping laws and regulations. It is a must to replace 
all obsolete and irrelevant laws and regulations, dating back to our colonial 
times, or the successive post-independence governments.

Our public administration and public management have to strive toward a 
world-class level. Sure, it is unrealistic to expect this to happen overnight 
or even by 2014, but I don’t expect to hear the same old excuses that reform is 
difficult, that change is hard or that it will take another Noah-sized flood 
for the government to change. 

In December, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said at a year-end cabinet 
retreat that corruption, underdeveloped infrastructure and bureaucracy slowed 
the country’s economic growth. 

“There is no reason for us to not be serious about making the fundamental 
changes,” he said. “It is not enough to just have an action plan for a 
bureaucratic reform. What we will see is [whether] there is change in the 
output, the outcome. And if those who do not and cannot change have become real 
obstacles, we have to release them [from their duties], because they hamper 
everything.”

It would be interesting to actually see people hindering reform — be it 
judicial, electoral, legal and bureaucratic — be dismissed and replaced by 
reform-minded professionals. A mere midterm cabinet reshuffle is no longer 
enough. We also need to reshuffle and expel those bureaucrats who prefer to 
conduct business as usual.

Yudhoyono nailed it. Bureaucratic reform is about restructuring the entire 
government.

Here are some questions that I think we should ask ourselves in the midst of 
our bureaucratic reform: How do we see Indonesia in the next 15, 25 or 50 
years? Will we need as many directorate generals in a ministry? Does the 
central government need to be streamlined to make decentralization more 
meaningful? Will we make each government agency responsible for their own human 
resource management?

If we adjust public official’s salary to be competitive with the private 
sector, should we also expect professionalism and have the right to fire 
under-performing ones or those breaching the law or convicted in a crime or 
corruption case? 

Yudhoyono and his government have been active in battling corruption, vowing in 
December 2009 to lead “a jihad against corruption,” ratifying the UN Convention 
Against Corruption in 2006, and in May signed Presidential Regulation No. 55 on 
the 2012-2025 National Strategy for Corruption Prevention and Eradication.

Now the work begins. Having a presidential regulation means nothing without 
implementation and enforcement. In 2011, Indonesia became a founding member of 
open government, committing itself to promoting openness, engaging citizens in 
decision-making, implementing the highest standards of professional integrity 
and increasing access to new technologies to help people access information and 
voice their concerns. 

Our commitment to open government leaves us no more reason or excuse to 
maintain the status quo. No more excuses for the government to dodge or stall 
reform. No more excuses for the House to ignore its constituents’ concerns in 
law-making. No more excuses for citizens to accept less than an open and 
ever-improving Indonesia. 

The question waiting to be answered is: How far and how fast do we want to go 
on this path of reform?

Maggy Horhoruw is an Institutional Reform Advisor with the Governance 
Assistance Team (TBTKP) 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke