Satanic Doodles

Zia Haq and Mayank Tewari

New Delhi, February 12, 2006

Sikandar, a 35-year-old St Stephen’s alumnus who prides himself on his 
secular views, carefully times his weekly Friday visit to the Jama Masjid to 
miss the Shahi Imam’s speech. But last week, stirred by an “attack on 
Islam”, he not only listened to the speech, but also kicked and spat on the 
Danish flag that had been made to be defaced on the Shahi Imam’s orders.

“I am completely aghast! How can someone insult a religion and get away with 
it on account of freedom of speech?” he cries. “Every time the image of a 
Hindu god is negatively projected in the Western world, there is an 
immediate outcry in India. Muslims support it because we respect all 
religions. More often than not, an apology is extracted. But in this case, 
instead of an apology, the European papers have reprinted the cartoons over 
and over again,” he laments.

That the Indian Muslim is seething with rage couldn’t have been more evident 
than on last Friday at the Jama Masjid. An effigy of Denmark filled with 
fireworks was ignited. Various signs strung to the gates screamed “Denmark 
Down Down.” And in what symbolised an ultimate clash of civilisations, 
children urinated upon on the flag while the elders spat upon it and pelted 
it with stones.

Voices converged in the vociferous condemnation of what was seen not just as 
a ‘sin’ on the part of the Danish newspaper, the Jyllands-Posten that 
published the cartoons, but also the whole of Denmark. Says 25-year-old 
Mohammed Imti Yazkhan, a school teacher, “The people of Denmark are 
supporting the paper by reading it, so they are anti-Muslim too.”

Speaking to Sunday HT, the Shahi Imam Maulana Syed Ahmed Bukhari emphasised 
that Muslims won’t take the insults lying low. “How can someone depict the 
Prophet? Incidentally, a second cartoon was published showing the Prophet 
disturbed by the protests against the first cartoon. What is the meaning of 
all this?” he asks.

Though he is opposed to violent protests, Shahi Imam Bukhari says he doesn’t 
condemn attacks on the embassies. “People will obviously get angry if their 
deepest and most pious sentiments are repeatedly hurt,” he says.

The caricatures, the Muslims believe, could not have come at a worse time. 
Feeling increasingly alienated in the global order, they refer to the 
Quranic couplet La Illaha Illalla Mahammadur Rasullulah, which means: Allah 
is the one and only God and Mohammed is his messenger. There can be no 
photographic representation of the Prophet, according to his own 
instructions. There cannot be any symbolic representation either. He is to 
be looked upon as the invisible friend, guide and philosopher by his 
followers.

Dr Anwar Alam Pasha, a lecturer at the the Urdu Centre, says considering the 
situation in Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries, it is only “obvious that 
the cartoons were meant to provoke a reaction.”

Though Shahi Imam Bukhari didn’t refer to America in his Friday sermon, the 
Indian Muslim hasn’t entirely absolved President George W. Bush.

Dr. Laique Ahmed, 34, who participated in the Jama Masjid protests, says, “I 
am protesting against the American government for not condemning the 
cartoons.” He adds, “Bush supports Denmark and says it’s about freedom of 
speech, but he is in favour of the cartoons only because he is anti-Muslim. 
He is actually the head of the anti-Islam lobby in the world.”

While Bukhari plans to trigger peaceful protests all over the country, the 
imam of a northwestern Delhi mosque believes that the time is right for 
jehad. “If Muslims are bothered about their religion, they should call for a 
jehad when Islam is abused,” he says.

The outrage of the Indian Muslim however, remains muted compared to Muslims 
worldwide, and doesn’t show signs of escalating into a jehad as of now. 
Despite the heartburn, there have only been sporadic protests and they were 
certainly not as violent as those in West Asia.

An imam opines, “Religion does matter as much to an Indian Muslim. But we 
have been tamed by hostility.” Asked what he meant by “hostility”, he leaves 
for his parapet inside the mosque with an open-ended line: “An atmosphere 
not conducive for the good of Muslims and Islam.”

Says a senior bureaucrat, “Indian Muslims don’t have a voice. They are 
subdued and not united on religious and political issues. This is why you 
will never see orchestrated protests.”

But though the moderates may not take to the streets and cry murder, they 
aren’t convinced with the ‘freedom of expression’ argument. “Muslims need to 
protest but not in an extreme manner,” says another bureaucrat, citing Saudi 
Arabia’s appeal to Muslims not to turn violent.

Moderate or extreme, the Indian Muslim asserts that he won’t allow his 
sentiments to be trampled upon. For Yazkhan, there was only one way the 
people of Denmark could prove to him that they are not anti-Muslim — “They 
should be with us and protest against the cartoons.”

Ahmed has a more severe retribution in mind: “If they arrest the leaders of 
the newspaper and the cartoonists responsible and hang them, then the 
problem will be solved.”

(With inputs from Meenal Dubey and Matthew Weir)

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1623536,0008.htm




Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe   :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List owner  :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke