Kalau tak ada alasan yang jelas yaa bajingan lah. --- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@...> wrote: > > Kalo orang Sunni ngebantai orang Ahmadiyah itu bajingan apa kagak? > > Kalo orang Sunni ngebantai non muslim, bajingan apa kagak? > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Abbas <abas_amin08@...> > >To: [email protected] > >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:02 PM > >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic > >"Pleasure Marriages" > > > > > >Â > >Orang Sunni ngebantai orang Shiah bajingan > >Orang Shiah ngebntai orng Sunni jug bjingn ! > >Inilah pernyataan RESMI dari Abbas Amien > > > >--- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > >> > >> Ni orang dungunya minta ampun. Kalo gua bikin pernyataan, apanya yg perlu > >> gua jawab? > >> > >> Tp kayaknya sih si Abbas Amin bilang bhw orang Shia itu bukan orang Islam, > >> maka orang Islam Sunni yg ngebunuh orang Shia ga dianggap sbg bajingan > >> oleh Abbas Amin, sebaliknya orang Shia yg ngebunuh orang Sunni adalah > >> bajingan. > >> > >> Hehehe... akhirnya Abbas Amin ngasih pencerahan. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >________________________________ > >> > From: Abbas <abas_amin08@> > >> >To: [email protected] > >> >Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 11:11 AM > >> >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic > >> >"Pleasure Marriages" > >> > > >> > > >> >Â > >> >Pernyataan yng sudah dijawab sendiri oleh si Debil ! Dasar si Debil > >> >memang bak anjing kena rabies, yng menggonggong salh waktu ! > >> > > >> >--- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Jadi kalo orang Sunni ngebantai orang Shia, maka orang Sunni ga akan > >> >> dianggap sbg bajingan oleh Abbas Amin. > >> >> > >> >> Sebaliknya kalo orang Shia ngebantai orang Sunni, maka si orang Shia > >> >> akan dianggap sbg bajingan oleh Abbas Amin. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Tentunya si habe akan ngedukung si Abbas Amin, hehehe... > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >________________________________ > >> >> > From: Bukan Pedanda <bukan.pedanda@> > >> >> >To: [email protected] > >> >> >Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 10:31 AM > >> >> >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic > >> >> >"Pleasure Marriages" > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >Â > >> >> > > >> >> >Ah, syiah itu bukan Islam... > >> >> > > >> >> >--- In [email protected], "Abbas" <abas_amin08@> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Siapa bilang itu sesuai dengan ajaran Islam !? Itu cocoknya dengan > >> >> >> ajaran SYIAH, tahu ?! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> --- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Hehehe... cuma Islam yg bisa ngasih solusi ke orang2 gila sex > >> >> >> > gimana cara muasin nafsu gila sex orang2 tsb, bukan? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Apa beda pelacuran dgn kawin muta atau kawin Islami dgn rencana > >> >> >> > bininya langsung akan diceraikan setelah puas? Kagak ada, kecuali > >> >> >> > yg dua disebut belakangan itu sesuai dgn hukum auloh dan ajaran > >> >> >> > Islam. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Islam itu emang agama yg benar unt para bajingan gila sex, > >> >> >> > pedophile, tukang merkosa dll. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > http://www.translatingjihad.com/2011/11/kuwaiti-shaykh-handful-of-dates-is.html > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Tuesday, November 22, 2011 > >> >> >> > Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic "Pleasure Marriages" > >> >> >> > Posted by Translating Jihad > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqRfhlYQo2w&feature=player_embedded > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Translated from video clip posted to YouTube, 17 July 2011 > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > In the above video, Kuwaiti Shaykh Yasir al-Habib, a Shi'a, > >> >> >> > explains and justifies the Islamic practice of zawaj al-mut'a, or > >> >> >> > temporary marriage (lit. 'pleasure marriage'), which is in a sense > >> >> >> > Islamically-sanctioned prostitution. In the longer clip which I > >> >> >> > took > >> >> >> > this excerpted portion from, Shaykh al-Habib starts out by saying > >> >> >> > that > >> >> >> > Sunnis often try to embarrass Shi'a by saying that they're going > >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> > marry their sisters in a pleasure marriage. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Al-Habib responds by saying that, first of all, in Islam a brother > >> >> >> > has > >> >> >> > no authority over the actions of his sister. And secondly, he > >> >> >> > contends > >> >> >> > that Sunnis want him to deny pleasure marriage simply because some > >> >> >> > people find it repulsive, to which he counters that "the Messenger > >> >> >> > of > >> >> >> > Allah didn't find it repulsive." Then he turns the argument > >> >> >> > around, > >> >> >> > explaining that Sunnis attempt to deny pleasure marriage while > >> >> >> > accepting > >> >> >> > marriage with the intent to divorce, which is essentially the > >> >> >> > same > >> >> >> > thing. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > He also brings up a hadith or saying from one of the companions of > >> >> >> > Muhammad, who said that, "We contracted temporary marriage giving > >> >> >> > a > >> >> >> > handful of the dates or flour as a dower during the life time of > >> >> >> > Allah's > >> >> >> > Messenger (may peace be upon him) and during the time of Abu Bakr > >> >> >> > until > >> >> >> > Umar forbade it because of Amr Ibn Huraith" (from al-islam.org). > >> >> >> > The last point about Umar forbidding it is where most Shi'a and > >> >> >> > Sunnis > >> >> >> > disagree--the Shi'a don't accept Umar as a legitimate caliph or > >> >> >> > successor to Muhammad, while the Sunnis do. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Subtitled video is above, transcript below (h/t Nonie Darwish): > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I tell him, âCome on, if youâre a man, then give me your > >> >> >> > sister in > >> >> >> > marriage, a marriage with the intent of divorcing after one > >> >> >> > night.â I > >> >> >> > could imagine something like that, now that you mention it. You > >> >> >> > know? > >> >> >> > Now, even if you find this repulsive, the Messenger of Allah > >> >> >> > didnât find it repulsive. The Messenger of Allah approved this > >> >> >> > marriage by > >> >> >> > recognizing it. The Messenger of Allah permitted and authorized > >> >> >> > (temporary) pleasure marriages. Now even if they later put it in a > >> >> >> > written hadith that he later forbade pleasure marriages, the > >> >> >> > important > >> >> >> > thing is that it was present (during the time of the Prophet). > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >If the marriage was by nature considered repulsive by the > >> >> >> > >Shariâah, > >> >> >> > meaning it was not pleasing to Almighty Allah and His Messenger > >> >> >> > (PBUH), > >> >> >> > then the Prophet from the beginning would not have permitted it. > >> >> >> > Why did > >> >> >> > he permit it? I mean, it wasnât considered contrary to the > >> >> >> > honor of > >> >> >> > Muslim women. Why did he authorize his companions to marry Muslim > >> >> >> > women > >> >> >> > for a short time, and to âenjoy them (sexually),â [Qurâan > >> >> >> > 4:24] even > >> >> >> > with a handful of dates? A handful of dates is given to any woman > >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> > enjoy her sexually, thatâs it. If you say that this is adultery, > >> >> >> > then > >> >> >> > youâre accusing the Messenger (PBUH) of adultery, or that he > >> >> >> > legitimized > >> >> >> > adultery. If you say this is repulsive, youâre accusing the > >> >> >> > Messenger > >> >> >> > (PBUH) of being repulsive, or that the Messenger of Allah > >> >> >> > legitimized > >> >> >> > that which is repulsive, Allah forbid. Is it not so? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >Pleasure marriage came to solve a societal problem. It doesnât > >> >> >> > >mean that > >> >> >> > it always has to be applied. However, if my sister did that, > >> >> >> > according > >> >> >> > to its rules and laws, whether she were a widow and her husband > >> >> >> > had > >> >> >> > passed away, or she were divorced, and so forth; if she needed it > >> >> >> > (for > >> >> >> > whatever reason), then this marriage would be according to the > >> >> >> > tradition > >> >> >> > (sunnah) of Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). There is no shame in > >> >> >> > this. > >> >> >> > No shame at all. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
