Membunuh manusia itu salah. Titik.
--- In [email protected], "Abbas" <abas_amin08@...> wrote: > > Kalau tak ada alasan yang jelas yaa bajingan lah. > > --- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > > > > Kalo orang Sunni ngebantai orang Ahmadiyah itu bajingan apa kagak? > > > > Kalo orang Sunni ngebantai non muslim, bajingan apa kagak? > > > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > > From: Abbas <abas_amin08@> > > >To: [email protected] > > >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:02 PM > > >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic > > >"Pleasure Marriages" > > > > > > > > >Â > > >Orang Sunni ngebantai orang Shiah bajingan > > >Orang Shiah ngebntai orng Sunni jug bjingn ! > > >Inilah pernyataan RESMI dari Abbas Amien > > > > > >--- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Ni orang dungunya minta ampun. Kalo gua bikin pernyataan, apanya yg > > >> perlu gua jawab? > > >> > > >> Tp kayaknya sih si Abbas Amin bilang bhw orang Shia itu bukan orang > > >> Islam, maka orang Islam Sunni yg ngebunuh orang Shia ga dianggap sbg > > >> bajingan oleh Abbas Amin, sebaliknya orang Shia yg ngebunuh orang Sunni > > >> adalah bajingan. > > >> > > >> Hehehe... akhirnya Abbas Amin ngasih pencerahan. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >________________________________ > > >> > From: Abbas <abas_amin08@> > > >> >To: [email protected] > > >> >Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 11:11 AM > > >> >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic > > >> >"Pleasure Marriages" > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >Â > > >> >Pernyataan yng sudah dijawab sendiri oleh si Debil ! Dasar si Debil > > >> >memang bak anjing kena rabies, yng menggonggong salh waktu ! > > >> > > > >> >--- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> Jadi kalo orang Sunni ngebantai orang Shia, maka orang Sunni ga akan > > >> >> dianggap sbg bajingan oleh Abbas Amin. > > >> >> > > >> >> Sebaliknya kalo orang Shia ngebantai orang Sunni, maka si orang Shia > > >> >> akan dianggap sbg bajingan oleh Abbas Amin. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> Tentunya si habe akan ngedukung si Abbas Amin, hehehe... > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >________________________________ > > >> >> > From: Bukan Pedanda <bukan.pedanda@> > > >> >> >To: [email protected] > > >> >> >Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 10:31 AM > > >> >> >Subject: [proletar] Re: Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies > > >> >> >Islamic "Pleasure Marriages" > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >Â > > >> >> > > > >> >> >Ah, syiah itu bukan Islam... > > >> >> > > > >> >> >--- In [email protected], "Abbas" <abas_amin08@> wrote: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Siapa bilang itu sesuai dengan ajaran Islam !? Itu cocoknya dengan > > >> >> >> ajaran SYIAH, tahu ?! > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> --- In [email protected], item abu <itemabu@> wrote: > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Hehehe... cuma Islam yg bisa ngasih solusi ke orang2 gila sex > > >> >> >> > gimana cara muasin nafsu gila sex orang2 tsb, bukan? > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Apa beda pelacuran dgn kawin muta atau kawin Islami dgn rencana > > >> >> >> > bininya langsung akan diceraikan setelah puas? Kagak ada, > > >> >> >> > kecuali yg dua disebut belakangan itu sesuai dgn hukum auloh dan > > >> >> >> > ajaran Islam. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Islam itu emang agama yg benar unt para bajingan gila sex, > > >> >> >> > pedophile, tukang merkosa dll. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > http://www.translatingjihad.com/2011/11/kuwaiti-shaykh-handful-of-dates-is.html > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Tuesday, November 22, 2011 > > >> >> >> > Kuwaiti Shaykh Explains and Justifies Islamic "Pleasure > > >> >> >> > Marriages" > > >> >> >> > Posted by Translating Jihad > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqRfhlYQo2w&feature=player_embedded > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Translated from video clip posted to YouTube, 17 July 2011 > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > In the above video, Kuwaiti Shaykh Yasir al-Habib, a Shi'a, > > >> >> >> > explains and justifies the Islamic practice of zawaj al-mut'a, > > >> >> >> > or temporary marriage (lit. 'pleasure marriage'), which is in a > > >> >> >> > sense > > >> >> >> > Islamically-sanctioned prostitution. In the longer clip which I > > >> >> >> > took > > >> >> >> > this excerpted portion from, Shaykh al-Habib starts out by > > >> >> >> > saying that > > >> >> >> > Sunnis often try to embarrass Shi'a by saying that they're going > > >> >> >> > to > > >> >> >> > marry their sisters in a pleasure marriage. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Al-Habib responds by saying that, first of all, in Islam a > > >> >> >> > brother has > > >> >> >> > no authority over the actions of his sister. And secondly, he > > >> >> >> > contends > > >> >> >> > that Sunnis want him to deny pleasure marriage simply because > > >> >> >> > some > > >> >> >> > people find it repulsive, to which he counters that "the > > >> >> >> > Messenger of > > >> >> >> > Allah didn't find it repulsive." Then he turns the argument > > >> >> >> > around, > > >> >> >> > explaining that Sunnis attempt to deny pleasure marriage while > > >> >> >> > accepting > > >> >> >> > marriage with the intent to divorce, which is essentially the > > >> >> >> > same > > >> >> >> > thing. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > He also brings up a hadith or saying from one of the companions > > >> >> >> > of > > >> >> >> > Muhammad, who said that, "We contracted temporary marriage > > >> >> >> > giving a > > >> >> >> > handful of the dates or flour as a dower during the life time of > > >> >> >> > Allah's > > >> >> >> > Messenger (may peace be upon him) and during the time of Abu > > >> >> >> > Bakr until > > >> >> >> > Umar forbade it because of Amr Ibn Huraith" (from > > >> >> >> > al-islam.org). The last point about Umar forbidding it is where > > >> >> >> > most Shi'a and Sunnis > > >> >> >> > disagree--the Shi'a don't accept Umar as a legitimate caliph or > > >> >> >> > successor to Muhammad, while the Sunnis do. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Subtitled video is above, transcript below (h/t Nonie Darwish): > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > I tell him, âCome on, if youâre a man, then give me your > > >> >> >> > sister in > > >> >> >> > marriage, a marriage with the intent of divorcing after one > > >> >> >> > night.â I > > >> >> >> > could imagine something like that, now that you mention it. You > > >> >> >> > know? > > >> >> >> > Now, even if you find this repulsive, the Messenger of Allah > > >> >> >> > didnât find it repulsive. The Messenger of Allah approved this > > >> >> >> > marriage by > > >> >> >> > recognizing it. The Messenger of Allah permitted and authorized > > >> >> >> > (temporary) pleasure marriages. Now even if they later put it in > > >> >> >> > a > > >> >> >> > written hadith that he later forbade pleasure marriages, the > > >> >> >> > important > > >> >> >> > thing is that it was present (during the time of the Prophet). > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > >If the marriage was by nature considered repulsive by the > > >> >> >> > >Shariâah, > > >> >> >> > meaning it was not pleasing to Almighty Allah and His Messenger > > >> >> >> > (PBUH), > > >> >> >> > then the Prophet from the beginning would not have permitted it. > > >> >> >> > Why did > > >> >> >> > he permit it? I mean, it wasnât considered contrary to the > > >> >> >> > honor of > > >> >> >> > Muslim women. Why did he authorize his companions to marry > > >> >> >> > Muslim women > > >> >> >> > for a short time, and to âenjoy them (sexually),â [Qurâan > > >> >> >> > 4:24] even > > >> >> >> > with a handful of dates? A handful of dates is given to any > > >> >> >> > woman to > > >> >> >> > enjoy her sexually, thatâs it. If you say that this is > > >> >> >> > adultery, then > > >> >> >> > youâre accusing the Messenger (PBUH) of adultery, or that he > > >> >> >> > legitimized > > >> >> >> > adultery. If you say this is repulsive, youâre accusing the > > >> >> >> > Messenger > > >> >> >> > (PBUH) of being repulsive, or that the Messenger of Allah > > >> >> >> > legitimized > > >> >> >> > that which is repulsive, Allah forbid. Is it not so? > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > >Pleasure marriage came to solve a societal problem. It > > >> >> >> > >doesnât mean that > > >> >> >> > it always has to be applied. However, if my sister did that, > > >> >> >> > according > > >> >> >> > to its rules and laws, whether she were a widow and her husband > > >> >> >> > had > > >> >> >> > passed away, or she were divorced, and so forth; if she needed > > >> >> >> > it (for > > >> >> >> > whatever reason), then this marriage would be according to the > > >> >> >> > tradition > > >> >> >> > (sunnah) of Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). There is no shame > > >> >> >> > in this. > > >> >> >> > No shame at all. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Tidak ada alasn ------------------------------------ Post message: [email protected] Subscribe : [email protected] Unsubscribe : [email protected] List owner : [email protected] Homepage : http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
