******************************************************* Todays forums are sponsored by Ian Martin Limited Engineering/Technical Placement Specialists www.ianmartin.com *******************************************************
At 03:27 PM 10/1/01 -0500, Jon Elson wrote: > > However, what I would have them do is to appoint -- or have us appoint -- a > > panel of users who would decide what was a new bug and what was merely a > > variation. > >Wow! What a concept! Let the buyers of the software (the users) actually >DECIDE what bugs need to be worked on, and what is a lower priority, to >be left for later. This, of course, would just about end the addition of what >we seem to think are useless marketing bells and whistles, in favor of >changes that would make our daily work easier! If you can get them to >agree to this, we'll have to send you to the middle east as our new >negotiator! Of course, that was not my idea. My idea was simply that a user panel would decide what was a new bug. It would not take any decision-making capacity away from Protel but would only determine a narrow issue. Certainly Protel might find other uses for such a panel, and so might we, the users. As to the middle east, are you crazy? :-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Abdulrahman Lomax Easthampton, Massachusetts USA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
