Paul - I haven't looked at protobuf-rpc, but protorpc uses a .proto message for the payload. One up-shot of that is that it should be (in theory at least) fine to add extension properties to the message - i.e. you could add a security object as an extended property. A given server could check for expected extension properties and act accordingly. The only issue I have with this is that you'd need to put the options *after* the main body, or push the tags out of order...
No idea if that is a good idea or not... Marc --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
