As a user, I'm less concerned with the internal hackiness level, more
so with the consistent
interface :-) The code is clean enough to support both, it appears.
I'd vote for it;
I can contribute some code if you like.

On Jan 12, 2:08 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> Hmm, you're probably right that the arguments should have used hyphens
> rather than underscores.  That said, we certainly can't just change it
> without breaking people, and accepting both seems hacky.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:19 AM, David Biesack <david.bies...@sas.com>wrote:

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to