Well, hackiness usually leads to deeper problems.  For example, if there's
two ways to write the flag, then it's harder to grep for usages of it,
particularly if you aren't actually aware that there are multiple ways to
write it.  I'm still leaning against this.
Anyone else have an opinion?

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:52 PM, David Biesack <david.bies...@sas.com>wrote:

>
> As a user, I'm less concerned with the internal hackiness level, more
> so with the consistent
> interface :-) The code is clean enough to support both, it appears.
> I'd vote for it;
> I can contribute some code if you like.
>
> On Jan 12, 2:08 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> > Hmm, you're probably right that the arguments should have used hyphens
> > rather than underscores.  That said, we certainly can't just change it
> > without breaking people, and accepting both seems hacky.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:19 AM, David Biesack <david.bies...@sas.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to