On Jun 2, 11:56 pm, "Jon Skeet <sk...@pobox.com>" <sk...@pobox.com>
> One positive thing to note is that if I can get the dynamic stuff
> working with the C# port (when I've got custom options to actually
> work: there's a whole bunch of changes I missed before) it should be
> usable from IronPython. I know that .NET 4.0 and IronPython will only
> be useful to a subset of our Python "customers" but it may be faster
> than a pure Python implementation. (I'd be interested to see.)

Marc pointed out to me that of course any of the .NET implementations
should be usable from IronPython anyway. Note to self: don't post when


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to