On Jun 2, 11:56 pm, "Jon Skeet <sk...@pobox.com>" <sk...@pobox.com> wrote: > One positive thing to note is that if I can get the dynamic stuff > working with the C# port (when I've got custom options to actually > work: there's a whole bunch of changes I missed before) it should be > usable from IronPython. I know that .NET 4.0 and IronPython will only > be useful to a subset of our Python "customers" but it may be faster > than a pure Python implementation. (I'd be interested to see.)
Marc pointed out to me that of course any of the .NET implementations should be usable from IronPython anyway. Note to self: don't post when tired. Jon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
