If by stubs you mean the generated language code, it shouldn't make any difference where you generate the code and where you compile it into your program, even for C++. For Java that you're interested in, of course, the code is portable everywhere there's a JVM anyway. I haven't looked at a Perl implementation but I would be surprised if it was any different.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Gregor Stich <grgs...@googlemail.com>wrote: > > Thanks for your answers! > > Just another ``trivial´´ question: > Let's assume that I've installed Protocol Buffers on my Windows(tm) > machine so that I'm able to generate language-specific stubs. I could > transfer them to the target system runnnig Solaris. Do the stubs still > depend on a protocol buffers "runtime"? I guess "yes", but maybe this > kind of stuff is managed thoroughly through native means offered by > the operating systems (?). > > What I am primarily interested are bindings for Java and Perl. > > Thanks > Greg > > > -- - Constantinos Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
