What is it that bothers you about the current build predicament? The Java code 
generated by protoc is very vanilla and carries with it all the other benefits 
of having been written in Java. Depending on how often your .proto files 
change, you could just check the results of your protoc invocations into source 
control and have your non-Unix devs use those generated Java classes ad 
infinitum. After all, a compiled protobuf install isn't necessary for normal 
operation. At least I haven't detected any traces of JNI or anything similar in 
the code.

On the other hand, having a pure-Java protoc doesn't seem like such a bad idea 
either. It's just that the devs at Google haven't had a need for it yet.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Yu <david.yu....@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:21:34 
To: maxaf<m...@bumnetworks.com>
Cc: Protocol Buffers<protobuf@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Any progress on the Maven plugin?

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:03 AM, maxaf <m...@bumnetworks.com> wrote:

>
> The plugin is perfectly usable. I stumbled upon it today during my
> quest to integrate protobuf with a Maven project. Here's what
> transpired:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1578456
>

Hmm, so it still requires that you build (on unix) and install protoc first
before you can use the plugin.
It would be cool if the compiler were ported to java to be 100%
buildable/portable in any platform.
If anyone had already started doing so, do speak up.  And I'm not talking
about the one from activemq (it generates different source)

>
> Forget about the damn unit tests. Just get the plugin out into the
> wild and end the suspense. It's good to go as is, at least in my
> experience. You'll undoubtedly get more exposure and testing done once
> it's out in the world and has gotten some real use.
>
> On Sep 3, 12:58 pm, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:
> > [+gak]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bjorn Borud <bbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > hi,
> >
> > > someone checked in a maven plugin earlier this year.   are there any
> > > plans to make this available through a Maven repository?
> >
> > > (in the process of adopting Maven, so not entirely sure how I can
> > > contribute at the moment)
> >
> > > -Bjørn
> >
>


-- 
When the cat is away, the mouse is alone.
- David Yu


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to