On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Henner Zeller <henner.zel...@googlemail.com
> wrote:

> I guess the naming is confusing in the example. The Visit is per
> field-name; but since the typed is named the same as the field in this
> example, it is confusing.

Yes, sorry.  Better example:

  message MyStream {
    option generate_visitors = true;
    repeated Foo bar = 1;
    repeated Foo baz = 2;


  class MyStream::Visitor {
    virtual ~Visitor();

    virtual void VisitBar(const Foo& value);
    virtual void VisitBaz(const Foo& value);

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to