Can the naming be

visit_bar()
visit_baz()

then?  It's good to have some consistency.

Frank

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 08:06, Kenton Varda <ken...@google.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Henner Zeller <
> henner.zel...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I guess the naming is confusing in the example. The Visit is per
>> field-name; but since the typed is named the same as the field in this
>> example, it is confusing.
>>
>
> Yes, sorry.  Better example:
>
>   message MyStream {
>     option generate_visitors = true;
>     repeated Foo bar = 1;
>     repeated Foo baz = 2;
>   }
>
> creates:
>
>   class MyStream::Visitor {
>    public:
>     virtual ~Visitor();
>
>     virtual void VisitBar(const Foo& value);
>     virtual void VisitBaz(const Foo& value);
>   };
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To post to this group, send email to protobuf@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
protobuf+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.

Reply via email to