As you can see the 28th field has a bit mask setup in the generated code:
// optional int32 StateSequence = 28;
inline bool Order::has_statesequence() const {
return (_has_bits_[0] & 0x88000000u) != 0;
}
inline void Order::set_has_statesequence() {
_has_bits_[0] |= 0x88000000u;
}
inline void Order::clear_has_statesequence() {
_has_bits_[0] &= ~0x88000000u;
}
The 29th field does not:
// optional .OXObjects.OrderStates OrderState = 29;
inline bool Order::has_orderstate() const {
return (_has_bits_[0] & 0x00000000u) != 0;
}
inline void Order::set_has_orderstate() {
_has_bits_[0] |= 0x00000000u;
}
inline void Order::clear_has_orderstate() {
_has_bits_[0] &= ~0x00000000u;
}
Anyone have a fix for this in the protoc.exe code generator?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/WXf9PyIg6xQJ.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf?hl=en.
