Comment #9 on issue 374 by [email protected]: Add method in ByteString to
avoid big buffer copy.
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=374
So, the java protobuf library is inferior to the C++ one? Why didn't
google release a feature parity java protobuf library? Presumably they
have one?
Or is Java a second class citizen at Google? Does this information demand
a reassessment of the sophistication of Google's Java libraries?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol
Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
