On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Stitcher <astitc...@redhat.com>wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:01 -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> > Can you comment on why you decided to inline it directly into the C
> header
> > files as opposed to splitting it out somehow? Given William's comment on
> > exceptions, it seems like it might well expand/evolve enough to make it
> > awkward to inline.
>
> This was partly for speed, and partly because I tend to think of C and C
> ++ as peer languages so that if you're using proton from C++ you would
> just use the same include files as using it from C.
>

Isn't there a way to split out the C++ stuff but still use the same include
files, e.g. include the C++ stuff rather than inline it?

--Rafael

Reply via email to