There is no proton group in reviewboard, so I'm forwarding this here for comment.
Andrew ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6929/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for qpid, Gordon Sim, Cliff Jansen, and Rafael Schloming. Description ------- As an experiment I've wrapped the pn_message_t and Pn_messenger_t structs and operations in very lightweight c++ classes pn::Message and pn::Messenger. To see how this looks I've also transcribed the python messenger examples to these new C++ wrappers. If this is generally liked then I propose to wrap the rest of the proton API similarly. Some possible controversial (and definitely revisable) decisions I made here: * I don't like to prefix setters and getters with "set" and "get" so I didn't * I put the wrappers in the supplied header files rather than in a new header file. Diffs ----- /proton/trunk/examples/c++/client.cpp PRE-CREATION /proton/trunk/examples/c++/recv.cpp PRE-CREATION /proton/trunk/examples/c++/send.cpp PRE-CREATION /proton/trunk/examples/c++/server.cpp PRE-CREATION /proton/trunk/proton-c/include/proton/message.h 1381265 /proton/trunk/proton-c/include/proton/messenger.h 1381265 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6929/diff/ Testing ------- Compiled and ran the transcribed c++ examples Thanks, Andrew Stitcher
