I would like someone with better Python/SWIG expertise to take a look at PROTON-687, at least to confirm if the python swig wrapper for pn_delivery_set_context (and other similar "borrowed" references) are the culprits, or the victims of a bug elsewhere.
I would like to update PROTON-581 (Schannel ssl for windows) for changes in the SSL internal api and get it checked in. I would also like to take a closer look at PROTON-660 (openssl on Windows) or have someone else review it for rc1. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Clebert Suconic <csuco...@redhat.com> wrote: > I have a commit that I would like to send towards a contrib component: > > https://github.com/clebertsuconic/qpid-proton/commit/ab423a90f6b1e6d06c84615c5724497a3f9e8533 > > > > The current code is always encoding it as Bytes, and I need the ProtonJ as an > output on the case of the JMS component. > > > > On Sep 18, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Miguel da Rocha Correia Lima > <mcorreial...@landix.com.br> wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, >> >> The PROTON-661 was useful for us. We are working with this patch >> without any error. >> We supose that it can be useful for others. >> >> Miguel da Rocha Correia Lima >> miguel at landix dot com dot br >> >> Em 18/09/2014 11:55, Rafael Schloming escreveu: >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> I'd like to put out a 0.8 RC soon. I will be going through JIRA shortly in >>> order to triage any remaining issues. If there are any particular issues >>> that you feel strongly should be included in 0.8, please follow up on this >>> thread and bring them to my attention. >>> >>> --Rafael >>> >> >
