----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cliff Jansen" <[email protected]> > To: "proton" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:04:25 PM > Subject: Re: 0.8 release prep > > I would like someone with better Python/SWIG expertise to take a look > at PROTON-687, at least to confirm if the python swig wrapper for > pn_delivery_set_context (and other similar "borrowed" references) are > the culprits, or the victims of a bug elsewhere. >
I can repro this on linux, simply by running the python tests under valgrind. I've updated the bug, will take a look. -K > I would like to update PROTON-581 (Schannel ssl for windows) for > changes in the SSL internal api and get it checked in. > > I would also like to take a closer look at PROTON-660 (openssl on > Windows) or have someone else review it for rc1. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a commit that I would like to send towards a contrib component: > > > > https://github.com/clebertsuconic/qpid-proton/commit/ab423a90f6b1e6d06c84615c5724497a3f9e8533 > > > > > > > > The current code is always encoding it as Bytes, and I need the ProtonJ as > > an output on the case of the JMS component. > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Miguel da Rocha Correia Lima > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Rafael, > >> > >> The PROTON-661 was useful for us. We are working with this patch > >> without any error. > >> We supose that it can be useful for others. > >> > >> Miguel da Rocha Correia Lima > >> miguel at landix dot com dot br > >> > >> Em 18/09/2014 11:55, Rafael Schloming escreveu: > >>> Hi Everyone, > >>> > >>> I'd like to put out a 0.8 RC soon. I will be going through JIRA shortly > >>> in > >>> order to triage any remaining issues. If there are any particular issues > >>> that you feel strongly should be included in 0.8, please follow up on > >>> this > >>> thread and bring them to my attention. > >>> > >>> --Rafael > >>> > >> > > > -- -K
