On 2/3/07, Christophe Porteneuve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What we figure is, we could emulate that in Prototype > by assuming whatever gets passed as a first argument has a "match" > method, which is passed the raw element (not its toString representation > anymore) and returns true (or anything boolean-equivalent to true) if > the element should be retained in the resultset.
Sounds good. What is the fallback if "match" isn't defined on an object? Will there be one? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
