Mislav Marohnić a écrit : > What is the fallback if "match" isn't defined on an object? Will there > be one?
I can't see a reasonable one. The spec will have to make that crystal clear: it's a match method or nothing. Just like Ruby's version mandates a === operator. Execution will end up with a "match is not method" error I guess. -- Christophe Porteneuve a.k.a. TDD "[They] did not know it was impossible, so they did it." --Mark Twain Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
