Mislav Marohnić a écrit :
> What is the fallback if "match" isn't defined on an object? Will there
> be one?

I can't see a reasonable one.  The spec will have to make that crystal
clear: it's a match method or nothing.  Just like Ruby's version
mandates a === operator.

Execution will end up with a "match is not method" error I guess.

Christophe Porteneuve a.k.a. TDD
"[They] did not know it was impossible, so they did it." --Mark Twain

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to