indeed! Sorry again for jumping the gun - sort of a vanity thing there I
guess (ooo, ooo, use my code, use my code), :)

At least one thing I do like about your implementation is the shortcut
syntax for supplying the subclass definition right within the Class.create()
call. When I have time I think I'll borrow that idea and apply it to my
Object.inherit implementation to get rid of a line of code.


On 9/27/07, Mislav Marohnić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/27/07, Ryan Gahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ok, then it does work, my apologies :)
>
>
> Every implementation breaks if you use it wrong.
>
> >
>


-- 
Ryan Gahl
Manager, Senior Software Engineer
Nth Penguin, LLC
http://www.nthpenguin.com
--
Architect
WebWidgetry.com / MashupStudio.com
Future Home of the World's First Complete Web Platform
--
Inquire: 1-262-951-6727
Blog: http://www.someElement.com
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryangahl

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to