indeed! Sorry again for jumping the gun - sort of a vanity thing there I guess (ooo, ooo, use my code, use my code), :)
At least one thing I do like about your implementation is the shortcut syntax for supplying the subclass definition right within the Class.create() call. When I have time I think I'll borrow that idea and apply it to my Object.inherit implementation to get rid of a line of code. On 9/27/07, Mislav Marohnić <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/27/07, Ryan Gahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > ok, then it does work, my apologies :) > > > Every implementation breaks if you use it wrong. > > > > -- Ryan Gahl Manager, Senior Software Engineer Nth Penguin, LLC http://www.nthpenguin.com -- Architect WebWidgetry.com / MashupStudio.com Future Home of the World's First Complete Web Platform -- Inquire: 1-262-951-6727 Blog: http://www.someElement.com LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ryangahl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---