2009/3/15 Tobie Langel <tobie.lan...@gmail.com>:
>> I wonder why Caja is taken in so much more consideration than a
>> practice that always existed in the programming world.
> There's two reasons to that:
> 1. I've been consulting for Google Caja team to make Prototype Caja-
> compliant,
> 2. Valija[1], the language which was created by the Google Caja team
> as a result of that work[2], is an approximate subset of the ES3.1
> strict mode, so supporting it today means supporting strict mode
> tomorrow.
> Best,
> Tobie
> [1] http://code.google.com/p/google-caja/wiki/WhatsMissing
> [2] 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-caja-discuss/browse_thread/thread/284935fa0784316d/31e476a985ae8c66?lnk=gst#31e476a985ae8c66
> >

Is there any evidence that NOT being strict is slower for a non-strict

Does missing a few {} or the odd ; in allowable places make the parser
have more work to do?

Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to