Hi Colin, Yes, I am sure, firefox handles it correctly.
One more thing I noticed is this: if you call $(id) before actually attaching the dynmically created tree to the document, it won't work in FF/IE. So I have to attach the tree first to the document, then call $(id). Now, for Chrome, Safari and Konqueror, the solution of attaching the newly created tree and then calling $(id) doesn't work at all, but it works only if you call the variable that contains the dynamic element (e.g.ul_el ). Vladimir On Mar 26, 11:37 am, ColinFine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 26, 8:56 am, Vladimir Ghetau <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Josh, > > > Sorry, what I meant there was new Element('ul', {id: 'myul'}) > > Are you sure that is the only element with id 'myul'? This sort of > problem is very often because browsers do not object to (illegal) > duplicated element id's, but then each behave differently if you try > to use them. > > Colin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype & script.aculo.us" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
