Hi Mark! It's great to have someone else taking a look at the data, so thanks!
> There may not be any x/y data to be had other than to really understand > what we have and why its the way it is, and work on making sure next > time we get data thats more useful. Huh. We looked at the raw data streams, and thought they were valid. And we saw reasonable numbers of packets per second, so I wonder if this is a post-processing problem. Jamey/Larry, did you see this same thing in your processing? I'm going to be very surprised if the X/Y data is toast. Mark, you should show up at one of our meetings and we should go over the data with you. Again, this smells like a post-processing problem. And by the way Jamey, that was NOT a cheap ADC. Me *and* Maxim Semiconductor are offended. It was... low cost. But not cheap! ;) > This data should be looked at as if it holds valuable secrets. Within > in it are system issues that need to be addressed that will influence > you avionics, payload, and software designs. Its full of gold. We totally agree :) ! And if we weren't totally focussed on rebuilding the rocket from scratch (sigh) we'd be spending a lot more time getting at the data. So thanks for helping with the processing of it! Andrew -- ------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Greenberg Portland State Aerospace Society (http://psas.pdx.edu/) [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: 503.788.1343 C: 503.708.7711 ------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ psas-software mailing list psas-software@lists.psas.pdx.edu http://lists.psas.pdx.edu/mailman/listinfo/psas-software
