Ya because I may have to use it down the road for school possibley.

On 2010-06-22, at 2:19 PM, Cameron wrote:

> Yes.  it is.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Michael Huckabay
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 3:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Digi 003
> 
> Would someone on list be able to confurm something with pro tools for me? Is
> the HD version of pro tools excessible?  Just need to know.
> On 2010-06-22, at 1:56 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:
> 
>> Yep, it will work as audio & MIDI interface but not as control surface for
> Logic. FireWire ports are 400 as well.
>> 
>> Slau
>> 
>> On Jun 22, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Cameron wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi.  the firewire connections are firewire 400.  And, I don't believe it
>>> will work as a control surface in Logic.  It would work as an audio/midi
>>> interface though I believe.  Bryan or anyone else, please correct me if I
> am
>>> wrong on that one.
>>> 
>>> The M Audio project mix with pro tools m powered is a much better bet.
> That
>>> will give you audio, midi, and control surface functionality in pro tools
> m
>>> powered, logic, sonar, etc.  I just bought a second hand unit this week.
>>> 
>>> And, the mic preamps might not be as good on the project mix, but, you do
>>> have eight of them, as opposed to only four on the digi 003.
>>> 
>>> Cameron.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf
>>> Of RvR
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:02 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Digi 003
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> Thinking of buying the Digi 003 with included PT LE but I am wondering if
>>> the Digi 003 also works with Logic Pro? In case it will ever be
> accessible
>>> of course.
>>> The spec sheet talks about two ieee1394a firewire connections, but don't
>>> mention if they are 400 or 800.
>>>     And the different 003 versions are only differences in software and
>>> rack or not right?
>>> Thanks!
>>> Ronald
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to