Jason Evans wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > In case there are still any problems and/or patches around > > we still have not included into the CVS state of Pth (see > > http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/), please do not hesitate to repost them > > here again. Perhaps they were just lost or overlooked. I'll try to > > make sure they are considered again. > > Following is a patch that I posted, and it has not been committed. As > noted in its explanation, it may not suite the needs of the maintainers, > but if you provide some feedback, I'm perfectly willing to do the work to > make it acceptable.
Hello Ralf and the list, I would like to kindly point out that there has been no response whatsoever (that I've seen) to Jason's email sent back on June 30, nor have the changes been incorporated into pth (according to the http://cvs.ossp.org/pkg/lib/pth/). This is somewhat ironic, given this particular thread... Cheers, -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com ______________________________________________________________________ GNU Portable Threads (Pth) http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/ User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager (Majordomo) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
