Fellow Australians, Today I was in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, court 7E, and witnessed yet another example of the unholy alliance/ conspiracy between the banks and Australian judges. Today was to have dealt with the issue of Discovery whereby I wanted statements and verification of the St. George Bank bank accounts in order to establish that banks create money and, therefore, are guilty of fraud by writing cheques for non-existent money which they make the principal in loan contracts. The judicial officer on this occasion was Deputy Registrar Hagger. Needless to say, he was hostile and refused to discuss the matter. He set it back to the 10th of August, which is after the 2nd of August when I am scheduled to requisition a trial by jury because, featured prominently in my Defence document is widespread judicial corruption of a multitide of judges rejecting that variable means uncertain which automatically renders such loans invalid and victims entitled to restitution, ie: the banks would have to give back the money they have stolen by this form of fraud. I argued that Discovery was important to prove the former type of bank fraud (ie: non-existent money, etc.)and that I had already filed an annexure giving Reserve Bank of Australia figures proving that banks create money. He ignored everything I said. The reason for putting it to 10/8/99 is that on 2/8/99 the bank will argue (a) to have my Defence struck out and (b) against allowing trial by jury. Then the judge can, on the spot, decide the case. Goodnight, nurse! I have fallen prey to this tactic before when a judge, Justice Virginia Bell, ignored and bulldosed through my evidence and pleadings for trial by jury when I was also claiming judicial corruption. She dismissed my claim and awarded cost to the St. George Bank for the umpteenth time. That is what the banks and the judges have planned for 2/8/99, ie: wipe me out by ignoring my simple and irefutable evidence; not allow a jury; and award possession of my home to the bank - in one-fell swoop. Unbelievable corruption!! Anyone wishing to witness it for themselves are urged to be in the Supreme Court, Queen's Square, Sydney on 2/8/99. And, incidentally, by awarding the case to the bank on that day, there will be no Discovery of the St. George Bank's bank accounts and they can continue to operate in secrecy, aided and abetted by the judiciary. Anyone wanting to read the background to this case is invited to look up my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au Anyone wanting to see the face judicial corruption, please come to town on 2/8/99 and/or tell a friend. Yours sincerely, John Wilson. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is the Neither public email list, open for the public and general discussion. To unsubscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=unsubscribe To subscribe click here Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=subscribe For information on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.neither.org/lists/public-list.htm For archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
