Danny Ayers wrote:
I've been studiously avoiding this rat king of a thread, but just on
this suggestion:

On 2 July 2010 11:16, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachm...@trialox.org> wrote:
...
Serialization formats could support

"Jo" :nameOf :Jo

as a shortcut for

[ owl:sameAs "Jo"; :nameOf :Jo]

and a store could (internally) store the latter as

"Jo" :nameOf :Jo

for compactness and efficiency.

what about keeping the internal storage idea, but instead of owl:sameAs, using:

:Jo rdfs:value "Jo"

together with

:Jo rdf:type rdfs:Literal

?

1: is there and rdfs:value? (rdf:value)

2: I would *love* to see rdf:value with a usable tight definition that everybody can rely on

Best,

Nathan

Reply via email to