On 4/12/11 10:50 AM, glenn mcdonald wrote:
BIND(URI(CONCAT("http://dbpedia.org/resource/";, ?label)) AS
?dbpResource)
The 1.0/1.1 clunkiness is just temporary, but I feel obliged to
point out the hand-waving in this join-via-URI-concatenation...
What now? You don't like the manner in which a solution has been
constructed? What are you looking for here?
I really think you can figure out for yourself what's not so great
about this "solution". But to go ahead and state the obvious, this is
concatenating wordnet's rdfs:label for these planets directly into a
dbpedia URI. This will only work if the identifiers happen to line up
exactly. Which they do in the case of these 8 (!) entities, but I
wouldn't want to rely on that tactic in general.
Again, is it about quibbling about tactics or solving the problem.
Stop quibbling, contribute a solution. That's my fundamental point. Each
time someone attempts to make a contribution you quibble without ever
providing an alternative. It' really really easy to quibble. Much harder
to do and be judged.
How about a solution from you? Then sit back and enjoy the effects of
others quibbling about your solution without any sense of what its taken
you to produce said solution etc..
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
