Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 4/22/11 7:36 AM, Martin Hepp wrote:
See replies inline ;-)
Sorry to say this, but I think you are making a mistake. To say that
the rdfs:label has to look like a variable name because it is for Web
developers sounds to me like you are saying that the javadoc of a
method should look like a piece of code because it is addressed to
programmers. I refuse to believe that Web developers understand
better pseudo code than natural language.
I will finally give in to use English spacing and capitalization for
rdfs:labels in GoodRelations, e.g. use
"Business entity"@en for gr:BusinessEntity etc.
But I will keep the cardinality recommendation in the rdfs:label of
properties, e.g.
serial number (0..*) for gr:serialNumber
Why not move that to rdfs:comment?
+1 seems more like a comment or a description from where I'm standing
too, rather than a label.
