On 4/22/11 1:35 PM, Bob Ferris wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 4/22/2011 6:18 PM, Martin Hepp wrote:
So our only disagreement seems to be about having the cardinality
info in the label, and I think that, at least for the moment, that is
the better choice as compared to the alternatives.
I really don't understand why you need this cardinality description in
a label of a universal. If a developer should get informed about such
axioms on a term, then a documentation is a good place for this kind
of knowledge.
For example, my SpecGen v6 fork [1,2] transforms such information
directly from an RDF graph into a readable HTML documentation that
includes RDFa as well, i.e., you even can get the full RDF graph out
of an HTML+RDFa serialized specification documentation. A nice
showcase term that illustrates the defined restrictions that are set
on this universal is olo:Slot [3].
Cheers,
Bob
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/projects/smiy/files/SpecGen/v6/specgen6.tar.gz/download
[2] http://smiy.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smiy/specgen/trunk/ (this
version is up-to-date)
[3] http://purl.org/ontology/olo/core#Slot
Martin,
Now here's the effect Bob's approach when passed through our browser page:
1.
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fontology%2Folo%2Fcore%23
-- alternative HTML view of the Ordered Lists Ontology
2.
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fontology%2Folo%2Fcore%23item
-- a property description page .
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
