Henry Story wrote:
On 19 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
but dont be surprised as less and less people will be willing to listen as
more and more applications (Eg.. all the stuff based on schema.org) pop up
never knowing there was this problem... (not in general. of course there is in
general, but for their specific use cases)
The question is if schema.org makes the confusion, or if the schemas published
there use a DocumentObject ontology where the distinctions are clear but the
rule is that object relationships are in fact going via the primary topic of
the document. I have not looked at the schema, but it seems that before arguing
that they are inconsistent one should see if there is not a consistent
interpretation of what they are doing.
Sorry, I'm missing something - from what I can see, each document has a
number of items, potentially in a hierarchy, and each item is either
anonymous, or has an @itemid.
Where's the confusion between Document and Primary Subject?
