On 19 Jun 2011, at 18:27, Giovanni Tummarello wrote: > > but dont be surprised as less and less people will be willing to listen as > more and more applications (Eg.. all the stuff based on schema.org) pop up > never knowing there was this problem... (not in general. of course there is > in general, but for their specific use cases)
The question is if schema.org makes the confusion, or if the schemas published there use a DocumentObject ontology where the distinctions are clear but the rule is that object relationships are in fact going via the primary topic of the document. I have not looked at the schema, but it seems that before arguing that they are inconsistent one should see if there is not a consistent interpretation of what they are doing. Henry > > Gio > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
