On 06/18/2013 12:05 AM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program wrote:
The debate about whether linked data requires RDF is actually a typical
example of a wrong formulation in the applicable logic formats in
reasoning resulting from the imperfection of natural language.
The formal definition of the semantic web and its component layers and
constituent tools like RDF is but one way of linking data.
That completely misses the point of this debate. The debate is not
about whether there are other ways of linking data. It is about the
meaning of the term "Linked Data" **as a term of art**. It is often
capitalized as Linked Data to emphasize that it has special meaning (as
a term of art) beyond just "data that is linked".
David
