Re: Proof: Linked Data does not require RDF

[Luca Matteis]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:01 AM, David Booth <da...@dbooth.org> wrote:

> That completely misses the point of this debate.  The debate is not about
> whether there are other ways of linking data.  It is about the meaning of
> the term "Linked Data" **as a term of art**.  It is often capitalized as
> Linked Data to emphasize that it has special meaning (as a term of art)
> beyond just "data that is linked".


+1

Actually I wish this entire discussion would be on G+ or HackerNews so we
could up-vote each answer and actually see the entire trend of the
discussion.