On 2015-02-03 14:31, Rigo Wenning wrote:
Anders,
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 12:42:07 Anders Rundgren wrote:
Although I agree with what you are saying there's a problem:
None of the stuff you are referring to has ever been directly connected
to the [UNTRUSTED] web, they are always used with a trusted App + GU.
if everybody had already thought about it, my contribution would be noise. My
apologies if this is the case. This is a chartering discussion. If thinking
about the eGov use case is overkill, we should state that openly and move on.
I just want this to be a conscious decision. This enables W3C to respond if
asked by the various governments.
Hi Rigo,
eGov is definitely not overkill, the problem as I see it is that you cannot
develop
things of this complexity without having a "team" dealing with the different
aspects.
Fortunately there's an alternative to shoehorning legacy-crypto in the
UNTRUSTED web:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-intents/2015Feb/0000.html
Best regards,
Anders
