Is payments also an overkill? On Feb 3, 2015 6:02 AM, "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-02-03 14:31, Rigo Wenning wrote: > >> Anders, >> >> On Tuesday 03 February 2015 12:42:07 Anders Rundgren wrote: >> >>> Although I agree with what you are saying there's a problem: >>> >>> None of the stuff you are referring to has ever been directly connected >>> to the [UNTRUSTED] web, they are always used with a trusted App + GU. >>> >> >> if everybody had already thought about it, my contribution would be >> noise. My >> apologies if this is the case. This is a chartering discussion. If >> thinking >> about the eGov use case is overkill, we should state that openly and move >> on. >> I just want this to be a conscious decision. This enables W3C to respond >> if >> asked by the various governments. >> >> > Hi Rigo, > > eGov is definitely not overkill, the problem as I see it is that you > cannot develop > things of this complexity without having a "team" dealing with the > different aspects. > > Fortunately there's an alternative to shoehorning legacy-crypto in the > UNTRUSTED web: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-intents/2015Feb/0000.html > > Best regards, > Anders > > > >
