On 6/9/09 11:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:32:49 +0200, Marcos Caceres<[email protected]> wrote:
Like I said, as far as WebApps is concerned requestFeature() does not
exists. What I meant was the requestFeature() undermines<feature>
without addressing the security issues.
I'm getting more and more confused. You claim you do not understand requestFeature(). You claim
requestFeature() makes<feature> useless. You claim requestFeature() is irrelevant with
respect to<feature>. And now you claim requestFeature() is less secure than<feature>.
I do not get at all the feeling that this feature is ready for standardization.
How about instead of taking little fragments of conversations out of
context you actually go and read the two specs? I don't see how you can
assess the how ready for standardization anything is based on the
conversation we have been having here. That's just trolling. Until you
go and read both specs and make comments against the specs, I'm not
continuing this discussion.
